Research paper on drug testing in schools

Threats to validity of Research Design Chong-ho Yu The books by Campbell and StanleyCook and Campbelland Shadish, Cook, and Campbell, are considered seminal works in the field of experimental design. The following write-up is based upon their books with insertion of my examples and updated information.

Research paper on drug testing in schools

Should students be drug tested at school? This includes taking measures to prevent tobacco, alcohol and drug use among students. Historically, schools turned to prevention programs like D. Instead of supporting the implementation of proven prevention practices, some administrators have turned to a more punitive and controversial approach: Why drug testing — and is it legal?

Drug tests are usually in the form of a urinalysis, which detects marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, PCP and opioids. The stated goal of such programs is to identify students with possible substance abuse issues and to intervene early. Today, schools and administers implement these policies with the intended purpose of identifying students who may have a substance use problem and referring them to treatment.

However, in many cases more punitive measures such as dismissal from extracurricular activities or expulsion have occurred. There are currently no federal laws regarding school-based drug testing, however, there are two Supreme Court Cases that grant public schools the authority to conduct drug testing in certain circumstances: Inthe Court ruled that it was legal for schools to randomly test student athletes Inthat ruling was expanded to included students who participate in a competitive extracurricular activity such as a marching band or chess club Once drug testing for student athletes was ruled constitutional by the Supreme Court, then U.

Bush established federal funding for its use and it grew in popularity. Byabout 16 percent, or 2, U. School districts, had adopted some form of a drug testing program. While federal funding for these programs has since ended as has other more effective forms of school-based preventionschool districts across the country continue to expand existing drug testing programs or adopt new ones using their own money.

Just this month, high school districts in California, Kansas and Virginia announced they were either implementing or are considering starting a RSDT for their students.

Although the Supreme Court has limited its rulings on the constitutionality of random drug testing to students engaged in athletics and other activities, some schools have expanded their drug testing to other groups of students, for example, students who drive to school, attend school dances or even the entire student body.

It is unclear whether these expanded programs are legal. The Supreme Court originally reasoned that athletes can be drug tested because they are role models and can influence the drug culture of a school, and that drug use and athletics are a dangerous combination.

This same logic was extended to extra-curricular activities. The good and bad As a controversial policy, there are two sides to the debate. Drug testing allows for early detection and intervention Students have a built-in reason to resist peer pressure, a well-known reason why kids experiment with drugs Schools are fulfilling their duty in promoting a safe and drug free environment It increases chances for students to have a successful future Opponents say that:- High schools in various school districts have conducted research to try and prove that mandatory drug testing can prevent drug use among student athletes.

Mandatory drug testing already occurs at the college and professional level in almost all sports. Based on work place drug testing policies, Random Student Drug Testing (RSDT) programs require certain groups of students (e.g., those belonging to a sports team or club) to be drug tested at school.

Drug tests are usually in the form of a urinalysis, which detects marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines, PCP and . Employee Drug Testing is Effective "Using the U.S. military's policy of random drug testing and zero tolerance, we find that a strict employer anti-drug program is a highly effective means of deterring illicit drug use among current users as well as potential users.".

Research paper on drug testing in schools

China has a long tradition of standardized testing and leads the world in educational achievement. China displaced Finland as number one in reading, math, and science when Shanghai debuted on the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) rankings in An advertisement for Paxil in The American Journal of Psychiatry, October ; from Christopher Lane’s Shyness: How Normal Behavior Became a Sickness.

Paxil is one of the drugs about which unfavorable research has been suppressed by pharmaceutical companies. Recently Senator Charles Grassley. Human subject research is systematic, scientific investigation that can be either interventional (a "trial") or observational (no "test article") and involves human beings as research subjects.

Human subject research can be either medical (clinical) research or non-medical (e.g., social science) research. Systematic investigation incorporates both the collection and analysis of data in order.

Random Drug Testing in US Public School Districts